Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other suitable remedy is provided by law." It is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust out there remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Online access to civil and criminal cases in find circuit courts. Cases might be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” aren't binding, but may be used as persuasive authority, which is to give substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. In case the appeal just isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then approach the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety days to the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided through the decision in the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
Power to levy tax and also to legislate on immovable property which include tax on yearly rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
Any court may seek to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to reach a different conclusion. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.
Generally, only an appeal accepted from the court of last vacation resort will resolve these types of differences and, For lots of reasons, such appeals are often not granted.
While in the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court would be the highest court inside the United States. Reduce courts within the federal level include things like the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, plus the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related on the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that more info involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each and every state has its possess judicial system that contains trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Each and every state is often referred to as the “supreme” court, although there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or maybe the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Despite the fact that state courts may generally hear cases involving federal laws.
How much sway case regulation holds may perhaps change by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances of your current case. To check out this concept, take into account the following case legislation definition.
ten. Without touching the merits on the case on the issue of yearly increases during the pensionary emoluments in the petitioner, in terms of policy decision in the provincial government, this sort of once-a-year increase, if permissible within the case of employees of KMC, calls for further assessment for being made with the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance on account of funding issues and not enough adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, demanding the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It might be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.
The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary into the determination on the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but will not be technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil law jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]